New Poll: How Old Are You?
After the last couple hardhitting Blade related polls, I’ve decided to make this week’s poll all about you. With a few hundred visitors coming to this site every day (and a couple thousand during the finale), there’s likely to be a wide range ages among the readers. As such, this week’s poll contains various age groups (completely made up by me with no significance) that you can select.
- 12 and under
- 13-18
- 19-29
- 30-39
- 40-49
- 50-59
- 60-69
- 70 and over
The votes received aren’t attached to who you are so there’s no privacy issues in case you’re wondering. I honestly have no clue what the breakdown will end up being, which is a big reason for my wanting to do it.
When I post the results Tuesday I’ll also reveal my age, which I don’t think I’ve done here yet. I will say that it is one of the options above, so you can narrow it down from there.
Tags: age groups, Blade poll













Hmm for what its worth I might have added one additional breakdown:
19-24
25-29
I figure 19-24 is that University/Secondary Education/Still finding themselves
crowd and the 25-29 have found there women, secured themselves with a job/career and potentially have maybe some kidlets hanging around.
So my guess is the 19-24 crowd has *more time* to watch the television while the latter has to *make time* to watch the television.
Of course I am somewhat generalizing and of course the poll is allready set up but I am venturing a guess this 19-29 slot will be the more sizeable audience and a further venture to guess the 19-24 crowd will be even more sizable.
Make sense?
Useless thoughts?
Cheers for now!!!
FYI 34 yrs here. Married 2 children 3 and 1.
Comment by Jeff Thomas — September 28, 2006 @ 1:08 pm
I actually initially had that as the breakdown (or at least really close to it), but it just looked wrong having that range basically cut in half with 5 and 6 ages while the remaining would have 10 ages.
I do agree though, that 19-29 range will likely maintain a strong lead.
Comment by Squirrelinabox — September 28, 2006 @ 2:38 pm